The rivalry between the Minnesota Vikings and the Chicago Bears remains one of the most statistically intriguing matchups in the NFC North. As of the conclusion of the most recent campaign, the numbers tell a story of defensive resilience, fluctuating offensive identities, and games that are almost always decided in the final minutes. Analyzing the Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears stats requires looking beyond the win-loss column to understand the efficiency metrics and situational performance that define these two franchises.

Recent Head-to-Head Statistical Breakdown

The last few meetings have provided a wealth of data for those tracking the progression of both teams. Two specific games in the 2024 and 2025 seasons highlight the razor-thin margins between victory and defeat in this series.

The 2024 Overtime Thriller

One of the most explosive statistical outputs in recent years occurred during their Week 12 clash in 2024 at Soldier Field. This game ended in a 30-27 overtime victory for the Vikings, but the box score reveals a much closer contest than the final score suggests.

  • Total Net Yards: Minnesota edge out Chicago with 452 total yards compared to Chicago's 398.
  • Passing Performance: The air attack was the primary driver for both squads. Minnesota’s primary passer threw for 330 yards and two touchdowns, completing 22 of 34 attempts (64.7% completion rate). Chicago countered with 340 passing yards and two touchdowns on a more voluminous 32-of-47 passing (68.1% completion rate).
  • Efficiency: Minnesota averaged 8.5 yards per pass attempt, showcasing a more vertical and explosive passing game, while Chicago relied on shorter, more methodical completions, averaging 7.2 yards per attempt.
  • Rushing: Minnesota found more success on the ground with 124 rushing yards (including a 106-yard performance from their lead back), while Chicago was held to 78 rushing yards on 22 carries, an average of only 3.5 yards per rush.

The 2025 Defensive Battle

In contrast to the high-scoring 2024 meeting, the Week 11 matchup in late 2025 was a masterclass in ball control and defensive grit. The Bears secured a 19-17 victory, and the statistics from this game provide a blueprint for how defensive schemes have evolved to counter high-powered divisional offenses.

  • Time of Possession: This was the deciding factor. Chicago dominated the clock, holding the ball for 36:59 compared to Minnesota's 23:01. This nearly 14-minute discrepancy limited Minnesota's opportunities to establish any offensive rhythm.
  • Total Yards: Interestingly, Chicago won despite recording only 320 total net yards, while Minnesota was held to 265. This game was won in the trenches and through specialized situational football.
  • Penalty Impact: Discipline played a significant role. Chicago was penalized 6 times for 40 yards, while Minnesota was much cleaner with only 2 penalties for 15 yards. However, the volume of Chicago's offensive plays offset the penalty yardage.

Offensive Efficiency Metrics

When comparing Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears stats over a multi-game sample, several trends emerge regarding how these teams move the football.

Passing Schemes and Target Distribution

Minnesota has historically prioritized a "big play" philosophy. Statistical data shows a high concentration of targets to elite perimeter receivers. In the 2024 OT win, two primary targets accounted for 276 of the team's 330 passing yards (83.6%). This indicates a top-heavy offensive structure that relies on superstar production to move the chains.

Chicago, meanwhile, has moved toward a more egalitarian passing distribution. In recent meetings, the targets have been spread across wideouts, tight ends, and running backs more evenly. For instance, in their 19-17 win, Chicago had five different players record at least 25 receiving yards, making the offense harder to predict but sometimes lacking the "knockout" punch seen in Minnesota's statistics.

Rushing Volume vs. Efficiency

The rushing stats reveal a significant philosophical divide. Minnesota’s ground game often lives or dies by the explosive run. Analysis of their 2024 stats shows that a single 41-yard carry accounted for nearly 33% of their total rushing production for the game. Without these outliers, their median rushing success is often lower than the league average.

Chicago's rushing stats are characterized by volume and consistency. In the 2025 win, they ran the ball 39 times. While the average yards per carry wasn't elite (approximately 3.1 yards), the persistent commitment to the run allowed them to control the 3rd-down distances and keep their defense fresh on the sideline.

Defensive Performance and Takeaways

Defense has always been the backbone of the Bears-Vikings rivalry. The statistical data regarding turnovers and sacks provides insight into how these units pressure opposing quarterbacks.

Turnover Margins

Chicago has shown a remarkable ability to generate takeaways in this series. Looking back at a notable Monday Night Football meeting in late 2023, the Bears defense recorded 4 interceptions in a single game. This statistical anomaly set a baseline for their defensive identity: high-risk, high-reward coverage schemes.

Minnesota’s defense, conversely, has trended toward a "bend but don't break" statistical profile. In the 2024 OT game, they allowed nearly 400 yards but tightened up in the red zone and in overtime, forcing Chicago into a three-and-out on the most critical possession of the game. The stat to watch here is "Points per Yard Allowed," where Minnesota often ranks higher than their yardage totals would suggest.

Pressure and Sacks

The battle at the line of scrimmage is reflected in the sack and quarterback hit totals.

  • Chicago's Pressure: In the 2023 MNF win, the Bears recorded 9 quarterback hits and 2.0 sacks, consistently disrupting the timing of the Minnesota offense.
  • Minnesota's Pressure: In the 2024 OT game, Minnesota recorded multiple sacks at pivotal moments, including a 12-yard loss in overtime that essentially ended Chicago's chances. This ability to generate "timely" sacks is a recurring theme in Minnesota’s defensive stats.

All-Time Series Context

To understand the current Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears stats, one must acknowledge the historical weight of this rivalry. The two teams have met over 127 times since the Vikings entered the league in 1961.

  • All-Time Record: As of early 2026, Minnesota holds a lead in the overall series with a record of approximately 68-58-2.
  • Playoff History: Despite the high number of regular-season meetings, the teams have only met once in the postseason (1994), with Chicago holding the 1-0 advantage in playoff wins.
  • Scoring Extremes: The highest-scoring game in series history remains the 48-41 shootout in 2008, a game that stands in stark contrast to the defensive struggles often seen in the modern era at Soldier Field.

Situational Football: 3rd Down and Red Zone

Statistical success in the NFL is often determined by situational performance. The Vikings vs Bears stats in these categories are particularly telling.

3rd Down Conversions

In their most recent 2025 meeting, 3rd down conversion rates were the primary differentiator. Chicago’s ability to convert on short-yardage situations allowed them to sustain long drives. Conversely, Minnesota’s reliance on the long pass often led to "3rd and long" scenarios, which are statistically difficult to convert against a disciplined Chicago secondary.

Red Zone Efficiency

Minnesota's red zone statistics have been a point of emphasis. In the 2024 OT game, they converted both of their primary red zone trips into touchdowns. Chicago, despite having more total first downs in several recent matchups, has occasionally struggled to finish drives, settling for field goals (as seen in the four field goals made by their kicker in the 2023 matchup).

The Impact of Venue on Statistics

The venue—Soldier Field in Chicago versus U.S. Bank Stadium in Minneapolis—has a measurable impact on the stats.

Soldier Field Factors

Games in Chicago tend to be lower-scoring and more reliant on the rushing game. The grass surface and potential for wind off Lake Michigan often suppress passing yardage stats. In the 2024 game at Soldier Field, despite the high yardage, the teams combined for several penalties and muffed punts, suggesting the elements played a role in the statistical volatility.

U.S. Bank Stadium Factors

The controlled environment of U.S. Bank Stadium typically favors the Vikings' speed-based offense. Statistics show that Minnesota’s passing efficiency and completion percentage are notably higher at home. The noise levels also contribute to a higher frequency of "False Start" penalties for the Bears when they travel to Minneapolis.

Historical Trends and Future Projections

Looking at the trajectory of Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears stats over the last five seasons, we see a narrowing of the gap. The era of one team dominating the series for 6-8 games at a time appears to be over. Since 2023, the games have been characterized by:

  1. Close Score Margins: A significant percentage of games decided by 3 points or fewer (including the 30-27 and 19-17 scores mentioned).
  2. Increased Defensive Scoring: A rise in defensive touchdowns or safeties, reflecting the aggressive defensive coaching on both sides.
  3. Special Teams Impact: Field goal accuracy has become a primary stat. Kickers in this rivalry have consistently been asked to make 50+ yarders to decide games, with high success rates.

Conclusion

The Minnesota Vikings vs Chicago Bears stats provide a window into a rivalry that is as balanced as it is intense. Whether it is the sheer yardage of a 2024 overtime shootout or the time-of-possession dominance of a 2025 defensive struggle, the numbers confirm that neither team can claim a clear statistical edge in the current era. For analysts and fans alike, the key metrics remain turnover margin, 3rd-down efficiency, and the ability of the ground game to mitigate the opposing pass rush. As these two teams continue to iterate on their rosters and schemes, the box scores will remain the ultimate evidence of the NFC North's tactical evolution.