Analyzing the statistical landscape of any NFL matchup requires moving beyond the final score to understand the underlying efficiency of each unit. When looking at the recent history between the Las Vegas Raiders and the Philadelphia Eagles, the numbers tell a story of two franchises moving in opposite directions. The most recent clash in December 2025, which saw Philadelphia secure a 31-0 shutout victory, provides a massive data set for understanding the tactical gulf between these two rosters. As we sit in the mid-point of the 2026 off-season, evaluating these specific metrics offers clarity on team identity and future performance expectations.

The Macro View: Total Dominance in Yardage and Efficiency

The box score of the 2025 meeting reveals a statistical disparity rarely seen in the modern NFL. The Eagles outgained the Raiders by a staggering 304 total yards, finishing with 394 net yards compared to a meager 90 for Las Vegas. This disparity starts with the volume of plays. Philadelphia ran 66 offensive plays, while the Raiders were limited to just 42.

In terms of per-play efficiency, the numbers are even more telling. The Eagles averaged 6.0 yards per play, a mark of a highly efficient, multi-dimensional offense. Conversely, the Raiders managed only 2.1 yards per play. To put that in perspective, any average below 4.0 is generally considered a failure of offensive scheme or execution; 2.1 is near the historical floor for offensive output in a single game.

When we look at Expected Points Added (EPA) per play—a metric that measures the impact of a play on the score relative to the down, distance, and field position—the Eagles operated at a +0.250 efficiency. The Raiders, meanwhile, plummeted to a -0.485 EPA per play. In the world of NFL analytics, a negative EPA of nearly half a point per play indicates a total systemic collapse, where nearly every snap is actively hurting the team's chances of scoring.

Offensive Efficiency: The Passing Game Discrepancy

The passing statistics from the 2025 encounter highlight the precision of Philadelphia’s air attack versus the stagnation of Las Vegas. The Eagles’ passing game, led by Jalen Hurts, was a model of efficiency. Hurts completed 12 of 15 passes for 175 yards and three touchdowns. While 175 yards may seem modest, his 11.6 yards per attempt and an 80% completion rate (with an adjusted completion percentage of 93.3%) indicate a vertical passing game that took high-percentage shots and converted them.

Key metrics for the Eagles' passing success:

  • Average Depth of Target (ADOT): 7.3 yards.
  • Air Yards: 126 yards.
  • Yards After Catch (YAC): 82 yards.
  • Explosive Pass Plays (15+ yards): 4 plays totaling 119 yards.

The Raiders' passing stats tell a different story. Kenny Pickett, filling in at quarterback, struggled to find any rhythm against the Eagles' secondary. His stat line—15 completions on 25 attempts for just 64 yards and an interception—translates to a dismal 2.5 yards per attempt. The most damning statistic was the Raiders' lack of explosive plays; they recorded zero passing plays of over 15 yards. The average depth of target for the Raiders was a conservative 4.3 yards, suggesting a scheme that was either unable or unwilling to challenge the Eagles' defense downfield.

Ground War: Barkley vs the Raiders Defensive Interior

On the ground, the stats further favor the Philadelphia side. Saquon Barkley took the lion's share of the workload, carrying the ball 22 times for 78 yards and a touchdown. While his 3.6 yards per carry average might seem pedestrian on the surface, the situational success was high. The Eagles' rushing attack generated 10 first downs, keeping the chains moving and the clock running.

The Eagles' offensive line provided 1.1 yards before contact on average, which, combined with Barkley’s 2.5 yards after contact, allowed the team to remain ahead of the chains. Tank Bigsby added 57 yards on 17 carries during the later stages of the game, demonstrating that the Eagles' rushing efficiency was a product of both individual talent and superior line play.

The Raiders' rushing attack was virtually non-existent. They totaled only 47 yards on 13 carries. Ashton Jeanty, a focal point of their offensive future, was bottled up for most of the afternoon, with the Raiders only managing one explosive run of 10+ yards the entire game. The disparity in rushing first downs—10 for Philly versus just 1 for Las Vegas—highlights why the Eagles were able to maintain such a massive advantage in time of possession.

Third Down and Red Zone: The Money Downs

Statistical success in the NFL is often determined by performance on third downs and in the red zone. In the 2025 matchup, these categories were almost entirely one-sided.

Third Down Efficiency:

  • Philadelphia Eagles: 77% (an elite conversion rate).
  • Las Vegas Raiders: 25%.

The Eagles’ ability to stay on the field allowed them to average 8.7 plays per drive, compared to the Raiders’ 5.3. This led to a huge discrepancy in points per drive: the Eagles averaged 3.4 points every time they touched the ball, while the Raiders averaged 0.0.

Red Zone Performance:

  • Philadelphia Eagles: 5 possessions, 4 scores (3 TDs, 1 FG). 80% scoring efficiency.
  • Las Vegas Raiders: 0 possessions.

The fact that the Raiders did not record a single red zone possession is a testament to the statistical dominance of the Eagles' defense. It is statistically rare for a team to be held out of the red zone for an entire 60-minute game, yet that is exactly what the data shows.

Defensive Dominance: Pressure and Coverage Grades

The Eagles' defense turned in an "A" grade performance across the board in the 2025 game. The pass rush was relentless, recording four sacks and ten total pressures. Brandon Graham, in a resurgent performance, led the way with two sacks. The pressure was not just about the sacks; it was about the consistency. Pickett was pressured on nearly 40% of his dropbacks, leading to hurried throws and a lack of downfield vision.

In the secondary, the coverage stats were equally impressive. Philadelphia’s cornerbacks, led by Quinyon Mitchell and Adoree’ Jackson, essentially erased the Raiders' receiving threats. Despite Brock Bowers catching 6 passes, he was limited to just 28 yards—a meager 4.7 yards per reception. This indicates that the Eagles' defense was playing a "bend but don't break" style in short areas while tackling immediately upon catch, preventing any yards after catch (YAC).

Key defensive stats for Philadelphia:

  • Total Sacks: 4 (35 yards lost).
  • Interceptions: 1 (Zack Baun).
  • Passes Broken Up: 2.
  • First Downs Allowed: 6.

Historical Context: 2021 vs 2025

To understand how these teams have evolved, we must look back at their previous meeting in October 2021. In that game, the Raiders were the dominant force, winning 33-22. The stats from 2021 provide a stark contrast to the 2025 shutout.

In 2021, the Raiders outgained the Eagles 443 to 358. Derek Carr, then the Raiders' quarterback, had a career-best 91.1% completion rate, throwing for 323 yards. The Raiders' offensive line allowed zero sacks, and the team scored on five straight possessions. At that time, Jalen Hurts was in the earlier stages of his development, throwing for 236 yards and two touchdowns but struggling to maintain consistent drives.

The shift from 2021 to 2025 represents a massive swing in statistical trajectory. The Eagles moved from a team struggling with defensive identity and quarterback consistency to a powerhouse that leads the league in EPA and defensive pressure. The Raiders, meanwhile, shifted from an explosive passing offense to a unit that, in 2025, struggled to cross the 50-yard line.

Positional Stat Leaders: Head-to-Head Comparison

When we break down the most recent stats by position, the gap in production becomes even more apparent.

Quarterbacks

  • Jalen Hurts (PHI): 154.9 Passer Rating, 12/15, 3 TDs, 0 INT.
  • Kenny Pickett (LV): 47.9 Passer Rating, 15/25, 0 TDs, 1 INT.

Hurts' passer rating was nearly triple that of Pickett’s. The efficiency of the Eagles' passing game allowed them to take the starters out early in the fourth quarter, giving backup Tanner McKee some game time.

Pass Catchers

  • Dallas Goedert (PHI): 6 receptions, 70 yards, 2 TDs.
  • Brock Bowers (LV): 6 receptions, 28 yards, 0 TDs.
  • A.J. Brown (PHI): 2 receptions, 41 yards, 1 TD.
  • Devonta Smith (PHI): 2 receptions, 50 yards.

While Bowers and Goedert had the same number of catches, Goedert’s impact on the scoreboard and yardage was significantly higher. The Eagles' receivers capitalized on explosive opportunities, while the Raiders' targets were limited to underneath routes.

Defenders

  • Nakobe Dean (PHI): 8 tackles, 2 tackles for loss.
  • Brandon Graham (PHI): 2 sacks.
  • Zack Baun (PHI): 1 Interception.
  • Maxx Crosby (LV): 1 sack, 1 tackle for loss.

Maxx Crosby remained a bright spot for the Raiders, providing the only sack of the day for Las Vegas. However, the Eagles' balanced defensive contribution across the linebacking corps and the secondary created a statistical wall that the Raiders couldn't penetrate.

Tactical Insights from the Data

The 2025 stats suggest that the Eagles’ success was built on a foundation of "balanced aggression." They didn't need to throw the ball 40 times because their rushing game and short-passing efficiency were so high. The use of the "Tush Push" and designed quarterback runs for Hurts (7 carries for 39 yards) added a layer of statistical complexity that the Raiders' defense failed to solve.

For the Raiders, the stats reveal a lack of verticality. When a team averages only 4.3 yards per target, it allows the opposing safeties to play closer to the line of scrimmage, further stifling the run game. This creates a negative feedback loop where the run game fails because the pass game isn't a threat, and the pass game fails because the defense is keyed into the short-area options.

Looking Toward the 2026 Season

As we look at the current 2026 rosters, these statistics serve as a baseline for improvement. The Eagles enter the season looking to maintain their elite status in EPA per play and defensive pressure. The retention of core pieces on the offensive line suggests their rushing efficiency will remain high.

For the Raiders, the 2025 stats were a wake-up call. The off-season focus has likely been on improving the quarterback’s average depth of target and finding ways to utilize Brock Bowers as a vertical threat rather than just a check-down option. Statistical growth in explosive play rate (plays of 20+ yards) will be the key metric to watch for Las Vegas in the coming season.

Conclusion: The Story the Numbers Tell

The history of Raiders vs Eagles stats is one of dramatic shifts. From the Raiders’ offensive masterclass in 2021 to the Eagles’ total defensive lockdown in 2025, the numbers illustrate the volatile nature of the NFL. However, the most recent data points to a Philadelphia team that has mastered situational football—dominating 3rd downs, red zone efficiency, and the turnover margin.

For fans and analysts tracking these two teams, the key stats to monitor moving forward are:

  1. Success Rate on Early Downs: Can the Raiders avoid 3rd-and-long situations?
  2. Pressure Rate Without Blitizing: Can the Eagles continue to disrupt QBs with just their front four?
  3. Yards After Contact: Will the Raiders' improved line play allow their backs to reach the second level?

While the 31-0 scoreline is now in the history books, the statistical lessons from that game will continue to influence how both teams prepare for their next encounter. The Eagles have set the bar high, and the Raiders are now in a statistical race to close that gap.